Jump to content

mech5107

Member
  • Content Count

    515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mech5107

  • Rank
    Boosting a Starlet
  • Birthday 11/22/1986

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Basildon

Recent Profile Visitors

2599 profile views
  1. I think this is turbo brakes. If they measure 254-255mm and are around 18-17mm thick they are turbo brakes.
  2. I would say no... connector is different and the mounting points don't seem to be close...
  3. Why you took them off? Anyhow, ct9 can do 150 whp, more is difficult. You should just need FMIC, some decent exhaust turbo back and just about all the boost without hitting boost cut. I was running 0.8 with the stock ecu. Do you plan to change the exhaust manifold. Since you have it out, it's a good oportunity to get one done. I think the stock manifold is too restrictive. I would be interested in a stock location manifold also.
  4. Hi... Also Greek, also ep71, also 2etelu. I live in UK though and my ep71 is in Greece. Take the wheel off and take a good photo of the caliper and the numbers cast on it. Could be ep82/91, ep71 turbo, gt/glanza
  5. I also have 2etelu in my ep70. Running toyota diesel C turbo, 60mm decat and full exhaust, FMIC with 50mm pipework, rx8 red injectors and standalone ecu. Those engines run fine with a T25 at 0.7-0.8 bar for about 180hp, but don't forget that most of those engines are now 30years old.
  6. If it's p7 springs and shocks, then i don't see why they shouldn't fit...
  7. Are you getting only springs or springs and shocks from p8/9? Springs with ep7 shocks should end up to about correct drop i reckon...
  8. The shocks are different (the shock mount for the spring) and should be lower than expected. But apart from that it should fit.
  9. Here you go: http://www.filedropper.com/2_77 It's missing the units, but units are not needed in most S/W.
  10. Hi mate, congrats on the tool. Perfect to get the some info on the stock map of the 4efte and have a good base map for standalones. About the formating, it would be easier for everyone if it was exporting the log like most data loggers do First line goes like: Time,TPS,RPM,ECT,Inj,Ign,.... Second line are the units: sec,%,rpm,degC,ms,deg BTDC,... Third line and on are the data for each timestep. I can provide a sample log if you like...
  11. It's pretty easy... If you running single piston/2piston sliding caliper (like levin), then find the size of the piston (say 51mm) divide by 2 (so 25.5) and then muliply by 3.14 (80.47) and then multiply again by the half diameter (25.5) so it's 2041.785. This is the area of each piston. If you have single piston, then multiply by 2 (the caliper is moving to acomodate that there is no piston in the other side, so the master cylinder is actually like moving twice the fluid. If you have twin pot then multiply by 4. If you have 4 piston, multiply by 4 again. This is the area of your
  12. It's not the file type, it's the fact that the data are in the same cell both numbers and text. For example in the injection colums it says 1.6ms... You can't plot/work easily with that type of formation. But an excel script to take out the "garbage" would be very easy to do...
  13. That's a very strange format for the log... not many software would open it easily. Do they provide a tool to view the log?
  14. A bigger servo would probably would make the pedal even lighter. You need a bigger master cylinder... but don't overdo it, as the bigger the master cylinder, the bigger the force you need to apply to the the pedal. I would say that the sweet spot for stock gt calipers is 15/16
×
×
  • Create New...