akaye4000 Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 Has anyone got a comparison between .64 and .82 housing to see what the difference in lag and power Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 No comparisons no as ive never run the .82 wouldnt fancy trying it on a 4e. could be ok on a 5e. (for my use) Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
akaye4000 Posted May 18, 2016 Author Share Posted May 18, 2016 Yeah I've got it on a 5e and it's laggy so was seeing what the .64 is like Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) Ive a wee video of a .63 housing on my 4e if you want an idea of what its like fire me a pm early map/spec looked like this. Phil Edited May 18, 2016 by Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stu Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 Ive tuned a .86 on a 5e for a customer - quite laggy from memory it did drop off boost between gears if you shifted too early. Saying that though the manifold wasn't one of mine and the merge collector was crap design which doesnt help with spooling a turbo. Dependant on what your after power wise you could run with the .64 or as an intermediate run the vband 0.72 housing. I just got one for my new turbo setup on the 4age. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 i just went right down to a .52ar housing! Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Stu Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 (edited) That's pretty small! Very interesting! How was that for top end power as I'd expect it to choke it quite a bit? Probably ok for a 5e though but really depends on the setup and what the use of the car will be.We had a 4a setup on the dyno last year, had just over 19psi on a small housing (can't remember exactly sorry) it made 226kw at the wheels, we swapped to a .68 housing and it made 268kw on 17psi (ran out of fuel) with no other changes so housing size can make a big difference. That's kinda why I bought the .72, to try it out and see what happens but also because it's vband so epic lush to work with haha. Edited May 19, 2016 by Stu Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 Yup really interested to see what it does myself!That's the .63 tial v band in that graph above and most we made was 380@1.5bar Fantastic on the road.But for sprints/hills I could do with less top end and more response.may even try antilag at some point.Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.