Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

its not too technical tbh, just trim and spec sizes, cam durations, and spool and turbo graphs or talking about them anyway

not technical once youve read into them abit previously

Posted

was a good read lol not tech at all... my view was he should have used something along the gt28 series, but choosing possible a larger turbine housing. but yeah wont go into it haha.

Posted

I don't know the ins and outs of of turbo selection (only read a lot of the Graham Bell stuff), but the graph/map you see could really be called the "choose your best compromise" - increase each factor (bigger turbo for higher revving engine) and you will have some downsides (bigger turbo results in more lag).

There's much more to it of course but that's what people going for the "ultimate" all the time forget, the boring sounding "best compromise" is normally faster 99% of the time while the "ultimate" is faster 1% of the time.

Same goes for brakes, fit 380mm rotors and 8-pots to a Rover Mini and you WILL win pub top-trumps with your mates....but try and built a competitive car round it!!!!!

Posted

well said, some people forget about the big picture sometimes when sellecting parts and building cars. I mean i've built some nice 600bhp mr2's in the past, very fast but you get them on the road and its just spinning up all the time and a well built 350bhp will leave it for dead.

Tim

TB Developments

Posted
well said, some people forget about the big picture sometimes when sellecting parts and building cars. I mean i've built some nice 600bhp mr2's in the past, very fast but you get them on the road and its just spinning up all the time and a well built 350bhp will leave it for dead.

Tim

TB Developments

Reminds me of the Cossie YB-T lads, found that up to a fairly fixed power limit the car got faster round a track (up to about about 380bhp from memory) but beyond that it just gets more and more undrivable (peaky) and the lap time gains were minimal...esp given the drop in reliability as the engines became more highly strung.

As ever there are always exeptions, but there was a lot of talk about it a few years ago.

Posted

yeah we found the same with the 3sgte in the mr2. 500bhp is about the absolute limit on the road, 400bhp makes a nice going road car and i can built that prietty reliably.

Drag racing is another story though, were at 955bhp with that, can't drive that on the road at all, spins in 5th frm just flooring the accelorator at 100mph lol, but drag its capable of 9's

sorry for going off topic but i take it you had some cossie background, thats where i cut my teeth building engines :rolleyes: built my first one at 14 ;)

Tim

TB Developments

Posted
yeah we found the same with the 3sgte in the mr2. 500bhp is about the absolute limit on the road, 400bhp makes a nice going road car and i can built that prietty reliably.

Drag racing is another story though, were at 955bhp with that, can't drive that on the road at all, spins in 5th frm just flooring the accelorator at 100mph lol, but drag its capable of 9's

sorry for going off topic but i take it you had some cossie background, thats where i cut my teeth building engines ;) built my first one at 14 :D

Tim

TB Developments

Not personally, they just got talked about a lot as I've got a Mk1 Escort "project". While we're off topic my mate has a 240bhp n/a YB in his Mk1 on Jenveys, but he's selling the engine to make was for a 2.4 YB headed 300bhp beastie, Holbay/Warrior (or "Diamond-something") alloy block. :rolleyes:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...