LukeH Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 All the n/a have high compression pistonsRods won't give any power gains. And I'd expect the 'weaker' n/a rods if there is any difference would be lighter anyhowwell being pedantic 5e arnt as high was trying to get at the 100ps being more like the fte setup at the time with sensors n mani's, seperate coil ignition, tps, icv ect. till they opted for a cheaper economy setup n ecu to suit. unsure on spec of jets in the gi tho. but thicker rods would be "safer" for 7200 redline bashing, tho pre v anyway so no alternative. bit of topic... lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PaulStarletSR Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 They had the Tubular intake, the same engine which makes 85bhp in UK Bugeye Corollas? Our engines made just over 85bhp with Tubular intake too so makes sense they would be that stock 89bhp mate....I've got 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Amjad Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 The difference must be from ECU/injectors then I suppose? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
morgey Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 (edited) At a guess, inlet, exhaust manifolds and throttlebody. i doubt the injectors wouldnt make much if any difference as you could up the duty cycle on the ep ones to suit what extra the corolla runs. The only reason i could see them changing them would be if they kept the same map but wanted more fuel they could give it slightly larger injectors to compensate. Saving them time on getting a base map if they can calculate the extra flow the inlet and exhaust allow.Which might be a reason to fit corolla injectors along with there inlet and exhaust mani'sExhaust diameter might be different, and possibly cams might be different but doubt the latter. Edited June 18, 2013 by morgey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.