eggy790 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 as aboveIn straight lineTrackStandard v standardModded v modded Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hill_bill10 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 i dont know too much about them but i would guess that they are about the same in a straight line, clio possible handles slightly better.i would also assume that the starlet/glanza turbo would be easier and possible more tunable due to the face it has a turbo, things such as bigger turbo, bigger front mounted intercooler, performance waste gates and all that turbo stuff that im not too clued up on. but i could be wrong, as i said, i dont know that much about turbo's as i dont have one Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ste91 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 Very narrow minded but...Glanza = Toyota = JapaneseClio = Renault = French Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hill_bill10 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 lol yes good point i forgot about that lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sk8chris Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 according too most places I've'e seen online the clio sport has a 0-60 of 7.4 so stock vs stock a gt should win in a straight line around a track the i'd say the clio, but the clio sport 172 has the same 0-60 as a gt Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nanglebadger Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 your probably correct G mate!Phil. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lukey_B Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 but starlets are cooler way cooler. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lee_EP82 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 I have 3 mates 1 has a 172 phase 1, another mate has a 182 and another has just bagged a 197. 197 handles awesome without a doubt so does the trophy clio 182.Id say the 172 was fastest then the 182 then the 197.Id also say that if it was a 4 way race it would end up 172GT182197 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sparky Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 This thread is gonna get out of hand soon haha so the clio with the lowest bhp is faster than the newer more powerful ones Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lukey_B Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 depends how 'large' the people are driving it hahhah or how many birds they can fit into the car ahah Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bluebear Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 This thread is gonna get out of hand soon haha so the clio with the lowest bhp is faster than the newer more powerful ones Also, the older clio would most presumably weigh less than the newer ones? Less options/safety features, etc? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
eggy790 Posted April 13, 2008 Author Share Posted April 13, 2008 so standard v standard. They pretty much equal.Any of u lads had a play with one on the road? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
liam2368 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 the Best of all the clios from a drivers point of view is the 172 cup fact!standard vs standard a clio without a doubt in my mind on a track a cup would keep with a pritty heavily modded glanza/gt no problemsbut too modify a clio you have to pay big money to get a 10bhp gain for example a common thing is a maxogen which are bloody expensive,decat,group n ecu and a 182 mani would be close to a bloody grand for not much gains to be honestspend a grand on a glanza your looking at 200+bhp/tonne so the clio would'nt stand a chance,as far as handling even with coilies and arb a more or less standard clio wouldnt have much problem keeping with the glanzas, renault know how to make little hot hatches, but reliability and build quility is farely shoddy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
eggy790 Posted April 13, 2008 Author Share Posted April 13, 2008 Make Model Year Power Weight (KG) BHP/Ton 0 - 60(Secs) 0 - 100(Secs) 60 - 100(Secs) 1/4 Mile(Secs) Term Speed(MPH) 1/4 Mile (D) (Secs) Term Speed (D) (MPH) Renault Cio Williams 93 150 980 155.52 6.98 18.92 11.94 15.43 90.31 15.23 91.89 Renault Clio Sport 172 mk1 00 170 1059 163.11 6.69 17.65 10.95 15.12 92.57 14.92 94.19 Renault Clio Sport 172 mk2 02 170 1110 155.61 6.96 18.52 11.57 15.39 91.14 15.19 92.73 Renault Clio Sport 182 04 180 1080 169.34 6.49 16.84 10.35 14.91 94.09 14.71 95.75 Renault Clio Sport Cup 02 170 1011 170.85 6.45 16.86 10.41 14.88 93.94 14.68 95.60 Renault Clio Sport 182 Cup 04 180 1060 172.54 6.39 16.54 10.14 14.81 94.64 14.61 96.31 Renault Clio Sport 182 Trophy 04 180 1070 170.92 6.44 16.69 10.25 14.86 94.37 14.66 96.03 Renault Clio Sport 197 06 194 1240 158.96 6.81 17.68 10.87 15.22 92.77 15.02 94.38 Toyota Starlet Glanza V / 1.3 GT Turbo 96 133 920 146.89 7.34 20.47 13.14 15.80 87.85 15.60 89.38 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
liam2368 Posted April 13, 2008 Share Posted April 13, 2008 they mean nothing in real life but as said standard vs standard clio wins,a 160bhpish glanza would be ok with a clio till top end even though clios are crap,modded vs modded definatly a starlet... p.s. I've owned both. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jules-B Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 stock for stock i would say the clio. But as soon as you start modding a gt/glanza it will be gone!. turbos are so tuneable. with little money you can up the boost to a bar and then if your still not happy you can alwyas get bigger turbos. I would imagine modding a clio engine would be very very expensivePlus you have got the reliaility of a toyota Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ecksjay Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 power wise, obviously the starlet can be taken much further.handling wise, a standard clio would crap all over even a heavily modified starlet, in the same capable hands.lightly modded, the clio will absolutely embarass it. they aren't comparable in handling terms, the clio is one of the best handling chassis' in existence, excelled only by the integra's.this has been discussed before though, so no need for another thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bourkey Posted April 14, 2008 Share Posted April 14, 2008 power wise, obviously the starlet can be taken much further.handling wise, a standard clio would crap all over even a heavily modified starlet, in the same capable hands.lightly modded, the clio will absolutely embarass it. they aren't comparable in handling terms, the clio is one of the best handling chassis' in existence, excelled only by the integra's.this has been discussed before though, so no need for another thread.Couldn't have said it any better.And yes there was another lengthy topic about this a couple of weeks ago.Bourkey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.