Dansstarlet1996 Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Is there any real differences between them or are they fairly similar?Thanks Dan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob H@RCH Engineering Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 There the same apart from some of the N/As only have 3 stud top mounts on the fronts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dansstarlet1996 Posted October 10, 2015 Author Share Posted October 10, 2015 Thought they were, Thanks Rob Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukEp Posted October 10, 2015 Share Posted October 10, 2015 Na shocks are weedy thin compared to glanza shocks. I change my fronts from uk NA to import glanza and they glanza ones were alot beefier. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Rob H@RCH Engineering Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 All the ones I've had have been the same SR ones are any way in fact the sportif ones where the same too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Socks Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Shafts are different. (Thinner and different top mount thread) Found this out when trying to fit some cusco top mounts onto an SR! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dansstarlet1996 Posted October 11, 2015 Author Share Posted October 11, 2015 so does it make any real difference in terms of lowering the car? like do the na ones bottom out past a certain amount? and are glanza ones any better or not a noticeable difference? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
morgey Posted October 11, 2015 Share Posted October 11, 2015 Sr ones are kyb excel G gas shocks for reference. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.