lol nah I'm a youngen mate. Wanted it built in time for my 21st, but that ain't happening so will go for my 22nd instead. Not telling yet, I'll put up a teaser pic when I get it
Jay over on TGTT done this to a JDM 100ps 4E. He swapped over a few bits and bolted on the ct9, its still going strong now and pulls very well so I'm led to believe. Has been done nearly 2 years I think. He just ran the turbo ecu and injectors.
Not sure if the N/A loom would be the same as I've never seen one, but if it has the correct number of plugs, ie 3 for the ecu, then I don't see why there would be a problem.
Deffo not the same as what it used to be. But people down in my hometown Basingstoke still go out for drives and tunnel runs etc. Hampshire, Wiltshire area. Will be doing quite a few tunnel runs when my cars built.
http://www.toyotagtturbo.com/forums/showthread.php?51204-major-problem-water-getting-into-cylinder-1&highlight=throttle+body+diagram Check post 8 buddy. Post 5 on this one. http://www.toyotagtturbo.com/forums/showthread.php?20512-throttle-body-vacuum-water-pipes&highlight=throttle+body+diagram
You would net more torque lower down the rev range, but it will suffer top end, which is where maximum ignition timing works best. You would be best off seeing what it does on the dyno, but every engines different.
No probs mate. I'm assuming because its a journal bearing turbo rather than ball bearing it will be slightly more laggier anyway. Not sure in terms of boost how much can be run comparing between the two bearing types. Just keep going until it stops making power I suppose lol.